i started here when i was 16, which was 2002. so that makes some sense. it was tiny when i first came here.

Bloop started in 2003.

I think it actually started in 2002. I know I got on here in Feb 2003, but I believe Steve actually started Bloop at the end of 2002.... November or something?

Oh, OK, I was close then. I believe I came here from OD around about May 2003, and it was a fairly small community back then.

Yep, it started to boom some time after that I guess. Few people were on Bloop in 2002 I think. I'm guessing it was mostly just Steve's friends and their friends...

Either way, it wouldn't be possible to have been here for 8 years. 6 years and a bit at the most.

Yep. Bloop has definitely not been alive for 8 years. lol 6 years and a few months indeed.

It definitely started in 2002. Look at the Copyright - 2002-2009.

How smart! lol

I know, I know xD. It was a wonderful idea! Lol.

WHY HAVE YOU NOT MENTIONED THIS THREAD TO MEEEE?!?!?! I'VE BEEN MISSING OUT ON THE FUN DAMNIT!! XD

Haha^^ "honey". They ARE the same person!

Honey, no we aren't. I've been calling people honey, darlin', babe, & sugar since I was 10. I highly doubt feisty has been doing that.

Fair enough. It's just so patronising to use it in an argument though (admittedly I have seen you do this only once, but it seems to be Feisty's speciality).

*sorry i know this is late i missed this message*

I do use honey a lot but it's not meant to be patronising. I just prefer honey, babe, sugar, or darlin' over actual names. I don't know why but I do. *shrugs*

I actually have nothing against people using them if it's in a nice way, towards their friends. But it looks childish when someone like Feisty tries to use them in an argument in an attempt to sound patronising. My apologies for implying that was what you were doing.

its cool.... whoa almost said chill haha. not you & are cool as far as i can see. you haven't been a bitch to me & i tried not to be a bitch to you. if i was i am sorry.

No apologies required.

awesome.

What? Your last sentence makes no sense whatsoever. Who is three against one?

And what on earth does 'oh & too & skull' mean?

*sigh* "at least 3 against one" would mean you & your friends against feisty. I believe & skull. & I have talked about this.

"Oh & too & skull." means to the diariest names & skull. Thought that was obvious.

It's not three against one. It's multiple one on ones. And she started every one of them.

Yes, because you've never been in my diary, right? Lol. Jodi's right. You are a hypocrit. And how many times do I have to say it... I haven't been in your diary for well over a week, and even then, it was only to reply to comments you left me! You clearly want to delude yourself that people actually like you, but I'm afraid no-one does. Just get it through your thick skull.

Actually, most of us have admitted we find the drama (in particular her ridiculous behavior) rather entertaining. ;D I for one have never known an adult to behave in such a way.

And her attacks on people were not in her diary (and none of us do read her diary... I only went there to reply to comments. Most of her entries are FO anyway, so what would be the point?), they were in other people's diaries (she called Mandy a moron on Puck's diary... followed by calling me a c**t in MY diary), and she's been rude to countless people on DA. She's a horribly aggressive person, and if I was you, I would certainly be careful of being friends with her (she liked me too initially, until I told her I knew about her lies... then suddenly I was a c**t).

What if you were feisty & she was the one saying all the things y'all are saying to her?

Umm... well Feisty has called me a c**t, dense, and idiot, a bitch, a stalker and creepy (which is way worse than anything that has been said to her). Still you will see that I have not resorted to being an aggressive little bitch in return. I have just laughed at her. So I think that answers your question. Grown ups don't respond in the way she has.

If you don't want replies, stop posting.