Search
Not Logged In
0
Your Username:
Your Password:

[ sign up | recover ]

Discussion Forums » General Discussion
UK General Election
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 21:39
Tommy Decentralized
Post Count: 506
is it that when referring to a noun it's too?
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 21:39
Tommy Decentralized
Post Count: 506
no no it cant be
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 21:40
~RedFraggle~
Post Count: 2651
A noun is a naming word. A verb is a doing word.

"Too" is neither a noun nor a verb.
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 21:56
Tommy Decentralized
Post Count: 506
yeah, it;s an adverb. and it;s a confusing little word to me. I'll pass. bec you are right, I'm noit really that interested in gramar. sorry. call me stupid bassed on gramar and spelling. chalk'em up for your ego stroking, fine with me. news flash for the millionth time. I I'm not impressed with gramar. I'm impressed with ideas. critical thinking. originality, etc. but never gramar.
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 21:57
~RedFraggle~
Post Count: 2651
Lol. Grammar.

And I don't think you're stupid based on that alone.
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 22:01
Tommy Decentralized
Post Count: 506
so we agree then. we both think the other is very stupid. your move in this silly little child's game

*done with you today*
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 22:09
~RedFraggle~
Post Count: 2651
Haha, difference is nothing I have said here shows me to be stupid...

You meanwhile have demonstrated plenty by way of stupidity... your horrendous use of grammar is just one example... others are the fact you referred to the British debate as the 'united England debate' (a made up country!)... another is that you tried to claim that the UK accepts the euro (it doesn't)... another is that you tried to use this non-truth as justification for your made up country name!

It matters not to me what you think of me, but believe me, I am not the one looking stupid here!

(Tips for future debates... do not try and claim you know more about a medical condition than a doctor does... do not try and claim you know more about a profession than a person working in that profession... do not try and claim you know more about a country than someone living in that country. It just makes you look arrogant as well as stupid)
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 22:10
~RedFraggle~
Post Count: 2651
And why do you bother saying that you're done with a discussion? You NEVER are! You'll be back. Predictable as ever.
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 21:22
Tommy Decentralized
Post Count: 506
oh yes, your ego is right. I;m so stupid I actually thought the letter K stands for England

hahahaha seriously dude. pick a real argument. not an emotional ego filled fluffy bunny nonsense one, you're so predictable.

Someone could tell you the meaning of life, and explain how you could have a key to all your dreams. and if they miss spilled one word, you would only focus on that and call them a bunch of names. It's quite sad. why are you like that? and what do you think you need to do to over come your problem?
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 21:25
~RedFraggle~
Post Count: 2651
Actually, no, shockingly, I'm aware that you can spell some words properly. But you clearly think that the United Kingdom and England, are the same thing. It's not that surprising, a lot of Americans do actually.
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 21:30
Tommy Decentralized
Post Count: 506
in your fucking dreams
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 21:16
Tommy Decentralized
Post Count: 506
*holds your hand*

England is the big dog in your elections. All US presidents have the royal bloodline. obama included. duh

united england = the world

one can make a case for that, in fact many do. step out of your bubble and have a look.

I actually don't, which is why, even though I don't deny our presidents having the royal bloodline, a part of an expected high society, in my opinion. I've always said greed controls the world, not people, royalty or no. so i find it funny, and like all good jokes there's some truth behind it!


my MAIN POINT is that voting for people is ridiculously STUPID, that a free society *snort* (a free system of government in it's self is an oxymoron) would want to vote on the issues, not for people. but that there is a way to do both, hence: "it is of the utmost importance that all nations model themselves after Sweden"


*lets go of your hand*
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 21:23
~RedFraggle~
Post Count: 2651
united england = the world

That's not what you meant at all. You SAID what i like best about the united england debates is all the screaming and yelling n shit, gawd is that for real?

You were talking about a world debate then were you? What world debate would that be then? Because it rather sounded to me like you were talking about the recent British debates.

And what on earth are you talking about saying "united England = the world", anyway?? What sort of nonsense is that? Can you provide any sort of reference of ANYONE other than Tommy using such a term to mean 'the world'??

And one single nation cannot be the 'big dog' in our elections, because that's not how it works. A party is elected based on the number of seats they get throughout the UK. If it wasn't for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, the conservatives would have gotten into power years ago. They didn't get in largely thanks to us (by 'us' I am referring to Scotland).
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 21:29
Tommy Decentralized
Post Count: 506
I do sometimes call the UK united england. for the record I know what it really means. I say that in humor, because of the royal bloodlines. and the way the economy is set up with the Euro.

your elections are just as fake as ours. the interest of the people takes a second (class) seat to where the money is. hello!

In fact if you want to get down to it. The US controls all of the UK anyway. If we say attack Iraq, you will. regardless of what your people want!
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 21:37
~RedFraggle~
Post Count: 2651
do sometimes call the UK united england.

Incorrect, so why say it?

for the record I know what it really means. I say that in humor, because of the royal bloodlines.

You've still to explain where exactly the humour is, or why 'royal bloodlines' justify the calling of the UK 'united England'?

and the way the economy is set up with the Euro.

WTF? What has the economoy or the euro got to do with anything? How on earth does that explain your stupid term of 'United England'?!? The UK (of which England is only one part) is part of the EU, as are many many other countries. They are controlled by the European Parlaiment, as well as their own parliaments... the other countries aren't controlled by England (or the UK for that matter). And the UK doesn't even have the Euro!
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 21:50
Tommy Decentralized
Post Count: 506
England is the big fish in your pond. if you don't like that, i understand. it does suck.

the UK is a member if the European Union. Which has the euro, which is an excepted currency in the UK, along side of the former currencies that are slowly being weeded out.

Ironically i support a one world currency.
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 21:56
~RedFraggle~
Post Count: 2651
Haha, nope, wrong again.

Firstly the word you are looking for is 'accepted' NOT 'expected' which means something totally different. Secondly, the Euro is NOT accepted in the UK (except possibly in some international airports). The currency in the UK is pounds Stirling. It is the ONLY currency accepted here.

I can't believe you don't know this! You CLEARLY must live in a bubble! (Note, that was sarcasm ;))

England is the big fish in your pond.

England has a greater population, so is 'bigger' in that sense, but you clearly don't understand how government works here. Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland are devolved nations. We control matters of health, education, tourism etc ourselves, seperate from the British government in London. We are partly under British (NOT English) control, and partly under our own control. To say that one nation alone is the 'big fish' would be like saying one single US state is the 'big fish' in the US.
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 21:59
Tommy Decentralized
Post Count: 506
wrong

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro


I know how being united works. Just like here in Nevada prostitution is legal. So are fireworks. In fact each of our states, like the UK, has it;s own laws, and local government. etc

must we continue this nonsense?
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 22:05
~RedFraggle~
Post Count: 2651
Umm... nowhere in that link does it say that the Euro is accepted in the UK! Because it is not. The currency in the UK is pounds Sterling, NOT the Euro.

Have you not learned yet that it's pointless to post links that don't support your point?

From your own link - "The United Kingdom and Denmark negotiated exemptions"

I know how being united works. Just like here in Nevada prostitution is legal. So are fireworks. In fact each of our states, like the UK, has it;s own laws, and local government. etc

In that case you will know that there cannot therefore be one 'big fish in the pond'. So yes, please, stop with the nonsense!
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 23:25
Tommy Decentralized
Post Count: 506
They were moving towards it. Brown announced a while back that the UK is testing out five things to pass, it didn't pass i think 4 pf them. and some negotiations failed, with Denmark. but i promise you, you will have the Euro one day, after all the UK is in the European Union.


greed, power- trumps whatever the little fish wants. Money runs the world. High Society, te upper class, the rich rule you. open your eyes up, escape from your little bubble of ignorance!
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 23:29
~RedFraggle~
Post Count: 2651
Haha. I knew you weren't really done. You never are.

And we may well have the euro one day (I'd be for it personally), but what you said was that the euro was already accepted in the UK, and that other currencies were being phased out. Both those points are incorrect.

And Gordon Brown most likely won't be prime minister after tonight anyway. :P
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 23:33
Tommy Decentralized
Post Count: 506
lol, i had to leave. I honestly didn't think i would be online the rest of the night. but here I am

who do you think will win?


and yes, i fucked up, i thought some countries in the UK did accept the euro, my apologies.
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 23:43
~RedFraggle~
Post Count: 2651
The currency of the Republic of Ireland is the Euro. But they are not part of the UK. UK currency is pounds sterling.

But apology accepted.

And I expect the conservatives will win, but without an overall majority.

I voted lib dems.
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 22:14
Transit
Post Count: 1096
No, RedFrag isn't wrong about the Euro (I think that is the point you are making, but correct me if I am mistaken), in your Wiki link you can see that only 16 members of the EU actually use the Euro (known as the Euro zone), you will also see the UK is not one of those. The only legal tender in the UK is pound sterling, however some places will accept the Scottish pound, we aren't even an unofficial user of the Euro (where it is widely accepted but not legal tender, such as Andorra).
0 likes [|reply]
6 May 2010, 23:30
Tommy Decentralized
Post Count: 506
well, i did think it was accepted a little bit. not fully. Like here in NY some stores do accept it. but that the UK government wants to move towards it. and i say it will one day.

Post Reply
This thread is locked, unable to reply
Online Friends
Offline Friends